She has a smaller rudder shift time and turning circle radius. Same shells, same penetration, same behavior, same damage. 3 torps, but since you cant get close to anything forget em, slow turning, weakest guns in class, no armour, over penetrate on DDs, hardly scratch CA's let alone BB's, no HE, i thought leander was bad. Originally posted by Zirnitra:just swapped my fiji for an edi, this is what i found. Perhaps someone else has some advice on the matter? In essence though, I'm not sure what advice to give since I'm no expert at RN cruisers myself. From what I know, they excell at fighting on the frontlines and dish-out out the MEAN AP hurt to DDs and other CLs.įrom observing people that play RN cruisers in the 2,000 or so games i've played so far, I'd say I've seen the Edinburgh the least, since well as you already pointed out, has higher detection range, same easy-to-citadel armor, but with no improvements to the 4x3 152mm layout that the Fiji sets up but has terrible tier VIII matchmaking instead of the glorious tier VII matchmkaing. I couldn't really give pointers for her unfroutantely since I don't like RN cruisers myself, since they are very difficult to position correctly without getting spotted and blasted out of the water. slightly more armor? All with the terrible qualities of tier VIII matchmkaing, Yaaay! What if they buffed Edinburgh with 4x4 quad turrets.?Īnyways, my shameless advertisment for Edinbrugh for quad turrets aside, She's a bigger, beefier Fiji with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |